Real User Monitoring

  • Tour
  • Compare
  • Download
  • Support
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Contact Us

Safety of WebSockets and Other Advanced Parts of HTML5

Posted by Cameron Laird on June 9, 2016 Leave a Comment

Is it OK to use WebSockets?

Absolutely.

Why, then, reader Klaas Hemstra wonders, did I write in “The Dangers of HTML5: WebSockets and Stable Standards” that the WebSocket protocol is an “unstable spec”?

The short answer is that this was the best I know in March 2011 when I wrote these words; the preceding hyperlink to the protocol definition was only finalized eight months later, in December of that year, for instance. Several of the other facts about WebSockets are different now. It’s worth taking a few minutes to get those facts right.

HTML5 complications

WebSockets are a Web standard for full duplex–simultaneous “push” and “pull”–communications between browser and server which “… slash the latency inherent in XMLHttpRequest …”, as I mentioned this summer in “Three main choices for advanced communications in HTML5“. Whole classes of applications, including performance-intensive games and demanding interactive medical programs, were restricted to the desktop until recently. WebSockets makes these practical within a standard browser.

When 2011 began, most end users relied on browsers that did not support WebSocket. Worse, quite a few serious analysts suspected WebSocket compromised the security of the browsers that claimed to support WebSocket. While that didn’t necessarily mean that it was wrong to use WebSocket at the time, a decision to rely on WebSocket certainly wasn’t automatic.

Now, it largely is. Internet Explorer 10, Firefox 6.0-current, Chrome 14.0 and above, Safari 6.0 and 7.0, several releases of Opera, including Opera Mobile (although not Opera Mini) are all among the browsers which do a good job with the WebSocket API.

My conclusions:

  • Sites need to explain clearly and accurately when individual write-ups were written or published or posted. “Application Monitor“, the Real User Monitoring blog, does this, of course.
  • HTML5 is big and sprawling and full of activity. Don’t ever fall into the trap of believing that “Browser X supports HTML5” is meaningful. You need to think always in terms such as, “which parts of HTML5 matter to me?” and “how can I gracefully retreat if this specific implementation turns out to be impaired?”
  • The WebSocket API is great fun, and lends itself to all sorts of interesting, high-performance Web applications. You can enjoy all this programming goodness now.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

  • 10 Tips to Improve Application Performance and Real User Monitoring
  • How is Generation Y reshaping the workplace and real user monitoring?
  • Brexit, Application Performance Management (APM) and Real User Monitoring– What’s the Connection?
  • Real User Monitoring and IT in the US Judicial System – Friend or Foe?
  • Open-Sourcing Upgrades to SSL-Decryption Library

Quick Links

  • Blog
  • Community
  • Support
  • Walkthrough Videos

Company

  • About Correlsense
  • Contact Us
  • Correlsense.com
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © Correlsense Ltd. www.correlsense.com
All rights reserved www.real-user-monitoring.com